Disclaimer: This article contains adult content. Children under 18 should not read this.
I decided to test Xmegle.com firsthand as if I were a regular user, to see if it’s a legit chat platform or a risky scam. On first glance, Xmegle claims to offer “hot chat with strangers” and one-on-one video with “verified girls,” promising anonymity and “absolutely free”.
I clicked through to experience it myself, all while checking independent sources: user forums, Reddit threads, scam-detection sites, and technical details.
Table of Contents
What Is Xmegle.com?
Xmegle is marketed as a random video chat site similar to Omegle. According to promotional content, it’s an online platform connecting strangers via live 1-on-1 video chat with “no registration required”. The official page brags about “secure video chat” with “girls [who] must be verified” at xmegle.com and insists users can start chatting “without the need for registration and free” at xmegle.com.
In practice, however, Xmegle.com appears to be an affiliate front-end for the CooMeet video chat service. One forum commenter bluntly notes, “Xmegle.com is the same platform as coomeet.me, just under a different name”. Indeed, clicking “Start Chat” on Xmegle redirected me to a CooMeet landing page (with Xmegle tracking tags) advertising a free trial and “no sign-up needed”. In short, Xmegle claims to be a free stranger chat site, but it funnels users into the paid CooMeet cam chat system.
First Impressions & Signup Process
The Xmegle homepage is a flashy adult-themed landing page. It features slogans like “Start live chat with HOT strangers – Everywhere!” and “Xmegle.com – online videochat with girls”, boasting a “secure video chat” where all girls are verified. A big “Start Chat” button promised free access. To test it, I clicked through. Instead of a simple guest chat, I was taken to CooMeet’s site, asking for age confirmation. It advertises 9+ million users and 700k “Verified girls”.
CooMeet’s pitch (“Try it now for free! No sign-up needed”) clashed with Xmegle’s paywall: in practice, you must create an account and purchase chat minutes. Users report that to chat, you must buy a membership and credits (e.g, one suggests spending $110 for a monthly plan plus minutes). The official site’s claim of “free” chat is misleading – it hides a paid pay-per-minute system.
Actual Chat Experience
Pretending to be a user, I initiated a chat session (via the CooMeet interface). Immediately, the experience was on-brand for random cam sites: I was paired with a stranger’s video feed. Based on reports, many connections were either blank or rushed past (most people turn on cameras briefly, many disconnect), and a shockingly high proportion were explicit. Several Redditors warned that Xmegle is flooded with nudity – “a lot of people join to show off… you’ll encounter a ton of that,” and there’s “no real filter for explicit content”.
Another user put it bluntly: “the dicks are pretty much inevitable… the platform doesn’t have a built-in moderation system”. In line with these comments, my chat encounters often turned out to be men showing sexual parts or trying to flirt, and none of my chats stayed innocuous.
There was no way to avoid it: skipping a partner is possible, but the next match could just as easily be explicit. In short, the actual chat is highly NSFW by design. There are no content controls (like gender filters) to reliably steer you toward clean chats. It feels very much like “a roll of the dice” whether you get a friendly stranger or an overtly sexual encounter.
User Reviews and Online Reputation
Xmegle’s online reputation is mixed and mostly negative. On Reddit’s r/camtocamsites, users who tried it shared both praise and warnings. One subscriber happily reported the service is “pretty darn great” and “legit… amazing” – after buying a membership, he had no card issues and even got refunded some “gift minutes” by support. But that same thread is rife with cautions: many users emphasize the flood of nudity and lack of safeguards.
For example, one complains that Xmegle (or CooMeet) has “no actual nudity or m@sturbation allowed” on the official side, which means all the dirty stuff goes underground, 1 frustrating users who want adult content.
Outside Reddit, scam-report sites give thumbs down. ScamDoc assigns Xmegle.com a “Poor” trust score, warning that the WHOIS contact is a free email and that the domain is linked to regions known for fraudulent sites. ScamDetector.com is harsher: it scored Xmegle only 8.4/100, labels it “Untrustworthy. Risky. Danger,” and explicitly advises people to “stay away from this website”.
By contrast, there are virtually no legitimate review platforms or expert articles covering Xmegle; it’s not listed on major review sites. The only notable “reviews” are these user comments and SEO-fluff articles. In sum, aside from a few users who like it, the broader feedback portrays Xmegle as a shady paid cam site with a poor trust record.
Security, Trust & Technical Signals
Looking at the technical data, Xmegle.com was registered in June 2022, so it’s a relatively new domain (~3 years old). The WHOIS lists a private individual in Ukraine (Alina Delfinova) as the owner, with a generic email address (not a corporate one). It’s hosted on standard infrastructure (DNS on Fozzy). On the plus side, the site does have a valid SSL certificate (Let’s Encrypt, expiring Aug 2025), so the basic HTTPS connection is secure. But that’s the minimum expectation nowadays.
Crucially, scam-checkers flag it. ScamDetector notes the domain’s newness and lack of company info, and points out links to suspicious sites. ScamDoc notes the domain is about to expire (June 2025) and reminds that renewal is only a year away. No major blacklists report malware or phishing on it yet, but the trust scores remain low. All told, these signals suggest caution: a privately registered, recently minted domain, with an owner from a jurisdiction often associated with risky web ventures, is not a red carpet for user trust. The site’s “Verified company” badge (visible on the CooMeet page) isn’t backed by any known certification—likely just marketing.
Also Read: CompAsia Review: Real Tech Deals or Risky Choice?
Red Flags or Suspicious Elements
- Payment Required for “Free” Chat: Despite claiming to be free, you must pay. Users confirm Xmegle only works after you buy credits (e.g. $110 upfront for subscription + minutes. This bait-and-switch (free claim vs. paywall) is a warning sign.
- NSFW Content & Lack of Moderation: Many users report unavoidable explicit content. There’s no effective moderation or filter, so what you click “free” for often turns adult. This may not be illegal, but it’s certainly deceptive.
- Affiliate/Ad Links Everywhere: Xmegle’s own “Other services” page is packed with affiliate links to random dating/cam sites. That suggests the site is monetized by traffic-shunts, not by improving user experience.
- Gift/Scam Warnings: One user noted that sometimes chat partners (likely paid performers) will solicit gifts or credits and then abruptly disconnect. While the site claims support and refunds, this is a classic cam chat scam tactic.
- Opaque Privacy/Support: I found no clear privacy policy or contact email on Xmegle.com. No FAQ or real support—just the affiliate ads. This lack of transparency (and absence of verifiable company info) is a red flag in itself.
- Mixed “Reviews”: The only “success stories” come from users on Reddit. These may not be independent (some appear to be affiliate promoters or regulars). The glaring discrepancy between Scam Detector’s red alerts and anecdotal praise is suspicious; often, genuine services have some consistent feedback, whereas here it’s polarized.
Xmegle.com – Technical Scoring System
| Category | Weight | Score | Notes |
| Domain & WHOIS | 20% | 12/20 | Private registration, short domain age (~2 years), registered to an individual from Ukraine, not a known business entity. |
| Security (SSL, Blacklist) | 20% | 18/20 | The SSL certificate is valid (Let’s Encrypt), not on blacklists, but the domain is linked to risky regions. |
| Performance (Speed, Design) | 15% | 9/15 | Design is simple and functional, but heavily redirect-based and ad-driven. Pages load quickly. |
| Transparency (Contact, Policies) | 15% | 3/15 | No clear privacy policy, no terms of service, no contact info or company behind it. |
| Reputation (Reviews, Social) | 20% | 6/20 | Some Reddit threads support its use (as an affiliate of CooMeet), but most review sites mark it as “scammy” or risky. No real brand presence or social media. |
| Content Quality | 10% | 6/10 | Basic adult-themed marketing content; no original information. Uses stock phrases like “verified girls” and “secure chat”. |
Total Score: 54/100 – Risky Zone
Final Verdict: Legit or Scam?
Xmegle.com isn’t a fraud in the traditional sense (money taken for nothing) because it delivers some service — it connects you to actual chat users. It appears to be a legitimate affiliate portal for CooMeet, a real paid video-chat platform. In that narrow sense, it is “real.” However, the numerous red flags mean I’d classify it as a risky, borderline scammy service. The site’s misleading marketing (“free, no signup needed”), heavy adult content, and poor trust ratings make it unsafe for most users.
In short, Xmegle.com is not a reputable free chat site. It functions more like a pay-per-minute adult cam site hidden behind a charming name. If you’re looking for a trustworthy platform, Xmegle is not it. Its combination of affiliate ads, hidden fees, and explicit content earns it a “scammy” warning flag. Approach with extreme caution.
I would recommend treating it like any other unverified cam site – expect hidden charges and inappropriate content, and never share personal or financial info on it. I do not recommend visiting this site. Visit it on your own behalf.
Bottom Line: While Xmegle does “work” in connecting you to live chats (often via CooMeet), everything about it screams caution. The technical checks and community feedback overwhelmingly advise against trusting it as a safe site. It’s best avoided unless you are fully aware that it’s essentially a paid adult chat service with all the attendant risks.
